"HTTPS Redirect" And Private Blogs

URL redirection is a Blogger magic trick, similar to a common sleight of hand trick in stage magic performances.

The Blogger HTTPS Redirection, a recently added feature in Blogger security, may be a similar Blogger magic trick - and a possible problem. Some browsers treat websites with multiple redirects as possibly malicious.

Private blogs, accessed through the Blogger / Google interstitial login, may also complicate HTTPS Redirection.

Interstitial webpages may pop up like magic, where you (or your prospective viewer) would least expect them.

• In front of a "private" blog, where you have to identify yourself to continue.
• In front of a blog that contains (or is reputed to contain) objectionable material (naughty pictures or such).
• In front of a blog that is (or appears to be) published off site.
• In front of a blog that has been blocked, for TOS violation, or maybe for hosting hacking content.

One of the problems with HTTPS Redirection may involve private blogs.

To access a private blog, you must be identified.

To access a private blog, one must be logged into Blogger, using an account that is a member or owner of the blog.

If you are not logged in to Blogger, you may be asked to identify yourself, to access the blog.

If you are logged in to Blogger, but using a non member / owner account to access the blog, you may simply be refused access.



Both of those displays come after the link to the blog - and before the blog is viewed. They are called "interstitial" webpages.

If you try to access a private blog, and are not a member / owner, you should see the well known Blogger / Google interstitial login webpage. In order to check that you are a member / owner, the infamous Google Login Cookie must be accessed.

The Google Login Cookie, created under the Google login sequence and accessed from a Blogger display, is a "third party" cookie. If the browser blocks "third party" cookies, as many do, the browser may refuse access to the private blog - even if the prospective reader is logged in to Blogger, as a member or owner.

If third party cookies are not blocked, too many redirects may present a problem.

If third party cookies are not blocked, some browsers may still have a problem - too many redirects. Some browsers may object to multiple redirects to other websites - as possible malicious content. A redirect to an interstitial display, following the "HTTP to HTTPS" redirect, may be one too many redirects.

The mysterious Blogger "private blog" interstitial display, which lets people login to a private blog when necessary, may contribute to the "too many redirects" problem, for browsers which are sensitive to multiple redirects. Even if a private blog member / owner is logged in properly, the interstitial display is still involved, in checking for proper login - and this is where the infamous "third party" cookie is involved.

You may need to adjust your security settings, for best results.

If you are trying to access a private blog - and you see "This blog is open to invited readers only", or you are forced to login, again (!!), you will need to check and correct your cookie filters. You might want to similarly check and correct your script filters.

Please remember that the filter that is affecting your private blog access - whether cookie or script - may not be part of your browser native settings. Check thoroughly.

---

One of the challenges involved with the recently added #Blogger "HTTPS Redirect" may involve private blogs, and the Blogger private blog interstitial login. "Third party cookie" filters, and the Blogger private blog interstitial login, will complicate this problem.

https://productforums.google.com/d/topic/blogger/WiR84_IRF8w/discussion

The Blogger / Google CDN, And Logout Problems

Recently, we've been seeing queries from some anxious blog owners

Why should I have to sign out a total of three, four, or more times?

With blogs that use a template that shows the navbar, the owner may logout, using the "Sign out" link - but the navbar may continue to suggest that they remain loggedin.

This problem may start with how we connect to Blogger, as part of the mysterious Internet cloud.

Blogger provides multiple connection points ("nodes") to their databases, through the Blogger / Google Content Distribution Network ("CDN"), in many different cities worldwide.

Generally, a blog owner will connect to Blogger, using the closest CDN node. Thanks to Internet Protocol networking with Multipath Routing, the "closest" node won't always be the node with the shortest distance, "as the crow flies", from the owner.

Determining logical distance between 2 computers involves more detail than simple geographical distance. Some blog owners will be equally "close" to multiple nodes - and this is where the problem starts.

All Blogger databases, in all CDN nodes, won't update immediately.

If a blog owner logs out from Blogger, when connected to one node, the Blogger database in other nodes won't always be updated immediately, to reflect the log out status. The CDN nodes update each other periodically - and there is always going to be some delay between updates.

The logical distance between a blog owner and a nearby node can change - and a different node may become "closer", at any time. With multiple nodes equally "close", the slightest change in the network between the blog owner and any "close" nodes can make the blog owner connect to a different node. The blog owner can fluctuate between 2, 3, or more "close" nodes, within seconds.

If the blog owner logs out while connected to one node, then re connects to a second node - before the first node updates with the second - the owner will appear to be still logged in.

Different CDN nodes may show a blog owner as logged in, until updated.

In some cases, the owner can continue to appear as "logged in", when connected to a different node. After logout (log out, signout, sign out) using the "Sign out" link, and the display refreshes, the navbar status will continue to display the account name and "Sign out" link.

Some blog owners will be equally "close" to multiple nodes. They may go through 2, 3, or more sign outs - until all nearby nodes are properly updated, or updated by repeated "Sign out".

Long ago, update delay led to a different mysterious problem.

Long ago, blog owners reported the mysterious advice

You have logged out from another location. Do you want to log in again?

Now, they continue to see the navbar "Sign out" link.

This monolithic error used to make many scream, in anguish.


Previous advice, to workaround the mysterious "You have logged out from another location. Do you want to log in again?", may work for the logout problem.

1. Check cookie and script filters.
2. Clear cache, cookies, and sessions (yes, all 3).
3. Restart the browser.
4. Click on the link below, to login to Blogger.
   

   https://www.blogger.com

A similar example of CDN node update delay involves post editor / template editor.

I see this problem currently, when updating posts. I update my posts, frequently - and see this error message, almost daily.

An error occurred while trying to save or publish your post. Please try again.

Post Editor, showing another monolithic error, after clicking "Update" - just as I updated this post.


There's nothing to do now, but hope for the best. The above procedure may or may not fix this problem.

Template editor will be subject to the same frustration. Any Blogger dashboard change that involves significant delay between opening and saving changes (such as editing) will have a similar problem potential. And here may be one more detail that affects stability of long term draft mode post editor sessions.

If you connect to multiple CDN nodes, while you update a post or edit a template, you end up with "conflicting edits". How should we expect the different database nodes to update each other, consistently, with different edits made to the different nodes?

Some blog owners connect through nodes in different countries.

With "nearby" nodes in different countries, it's possible that country local domains, affected by intrusive cookie or script filters, can complicate this problem. A cookie or script filter can prevent the "Sign out", until the blog owner is connected to a node in a different country.

A cookie or script filter can be a part of many network, performance, or security accessories, on the computer or network. Some filters are updated without knowledge of the blog or computer owner.

Network connections may change in milliseconds.

Multipath routing can cause network connection changes within milliseconds. CDN node updates won't be that frequent. Impatient blog owners may observe the lack of update from "Sign out", and report the problem.

Why would I have to sign out a total of three or more times?

No matter where Google locates their many nodes, some blog owners will be equally "close" to multiple nodes - and their connections can change frequently. The more equally "close" nodes, the more random path changes, and the more this problem will be seen, by different blog owners. Other blog owners won't care, because they may never see this happen.

The new "Responsive" templates may serve as a solution.

The new, "Responsive" class templates lack the navbar, and "Sign out". Blog owners, who publish their blogs to the new templates, won't use the "Sign out" link in the navbar - and they will not observe the delay in CDN node updates.

---

Some blog owners report that after logging out from #Blogger, the navbar continues to show that they remain logged in.

Thanks to the Blogger / Google Content Distribution Network, where an owner can connect to any of many different nearby CDN Nodes, this will probably always be with us.

Adding Whitelist Entries, To Adblock Add-Ons

Ad blockers are popular Chrome add-ons, which let us manage various websites abilities to serve ads in our browsers.

Many ad blockers include a script blocker. Like NoScript in Firefox, ad blockers may interfere with various Blogger features - such as the "Don't track" script, in the dashboard.

If you publish a Blogger blog, and you have a problem with any pages in the Blogger dashboard, you will want to whitelist "blogger.com" in your ad blocker.

You will do better if you not whitelist "blogspot.com". BlogSpot includes many Blogger blogs - and third party code on those blogs. If you are not very picky about what Blogger blogs you view, you won't do well permitting scripts on every Blogger blog.

Adblock Plus is an extension, in Chrome.

I use "Adblock Plus" as an ad blocker, on my Chrome installations. "Adblock Plus" installs as an app, or an extension.

There are several ad blockers available, for Chrome.



I use the "Adblock Plus" extension, in my Chrome installations.

Start with "More tools" - Extensions.

Select "Options" for "Adblock Plus".

Adblock Plus "options" are also accessible from the browser toolbar. Right click on the ABP icon, and select "Options".

Select the "Whitelisted domains" tab.

Let's whitelist "addthis.com".

Paste / type "addthis.com" into the box. Hit "Add domain".

And now, "addhis.com" is whitelisted.



And having whitelisted "addthis.com", I can support a useful third party social sharing blog accessory, by permitting ads that they host.

---

Some #Blogger blog owners use ad blockers in their browsers - and see problems with using various Blogger features. The Stats "Don't track", for instance, is vulnerable to ad blockers, and similar filters.

Fortunately, it's not difficult to whitelist "blogger.com" in your adblocker.
target="_blank"

Microsoft Windows Security Updates, May 2016

If you use a computer that runs Microsoft Windows, you may have been affected by Microsoft supplied updates, distributed 3 weeks ago.

May 10 was the day termed "Patch Tuesday" - the day when Microsoft releases important security related patches, to its various Internet updated products. During the 3 weeks after May 10, we've seen a significant number of security related discussions, in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue.

It appears that Microsoft updates, for May 2016, affect use of Blogger.

The Microsoft Security updates, applied May 2016, appear to have affected various Blogger features, that are known to be vulnerable to layered security.

• CAPTCHA visibility when daily post limit is exceeded.
• Publishing comments, or replying to published comments.
• Quick Edit icons.
• Followers / Reading List maintenance.
• Stats self initiated pageviews.

All of these features are known to be affected by cookie filters, and / or by script filters.

If you are using a computer that runs either Microsoft Windows 7 or Windows 10, and you are experiencing a problem with publishing comments, or with using Quick Edit, or with blocking your own views in Stats, or similar problems, you may want to check your cookie and script filters.

I note that some of the reports mention the browser used as Chrome or Firefox. You'll want to check filter settings in Windows Security Essentials.

Being realistic, it's also possible that Microsoft broke something within Windows - but we'll have to wait patiently, for them to admit that.

If you need different or more advice, please start a new topic in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue.

---

Microsoft released monthly security updates May 10, 2016 - and since that date, there have been a number of security filter related issues, reported in Blogger Help Forum. It appears that the the Microsoft Updates involve cookie or script filters, which affect use of Blogger.

Effectively Testing Reader Access To Your Blog

People reporting a problem with blog access / performance, in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue, will be frequently advised to diagnose their problems using affinity / differential testing.

Some diagnostic advice starts with simple instructions to "clear cache, cookies, and sessions". Some people, alternately, advise "use a different browser" - and test as a reader. These different strategies, seemingly redundant, will frequently lead to different results.

When you test reader access to a blog, some experts will casually advise you to "use a different browser" or "use a second computer".

There are specific reasons why this strategy may or may not be successful, when part of affinity / differential testing. When you test blog access, you're going to see varying reliability - based on a number of browser and reader details.

There are multiple ways to test blog access, of owner vs readers.

Any experienced testing technician knows that the most reliable testing, in affinity / differential analysis, will use identical browsers, on identical and separate computers.

Very few blog owners will have use of a bank of identical computers, for testing. There are alternate possibilities, when identical computers can't be used.

• This browser, in the primary session - after "clear cache, cookies, and sessions".
• This browser, in a secondary session - aka "Incognito" / "Private" browsing.
• A different browser, on the same computer.
• The same branded browser, on a different computer.
• Any browser, on a different computer.

All of these details will be relevant, sometimes - though not always. The differences between "always" and "sometimes" will lead to some testers using incomplete testing techniques - and cause inconsistent results.

This browser, in the primary session - after "clear cache, cookies, and sessions".

The best way to avoid environment based inaccuracy is to re use the environment, sequentially. This approach requires more time - plus development of a testing script, to keep testing procedures consistent.

It is, however, the best way to avoid confusion from inevitable testing variations.

Using the same browser, in the same browser session, one can try using a different identity. This technique starts with the apocryphal instructions to "clear cache, cookies, and sessions".

This browser, in a secondary session - aka "Incognito" / "Private" browsing.

Some browsers support multiple sessions. In Chrome, a secondary session is provided as "Incognito" mode - and in Firefox, a similar (not identical) option is called "Private" browsing. The differences between the "Incognito" and "Private" features are significant - and can cause different testing results.

This blog, displayed in "Incognito" mode.



A different browser, on the same computer.

Each different browser will have differences in the browser itself. Plus, different add-ons and settings, on the different browsers, will produce differing results.

Having both browsers on the same computer will eliminate computer setup differences, present when multiple computers are involved.

The same branded browser, on a different computer.

If the branded browser, on the two computers, is maintained identically, there is a chance for consistent results. Having two different computers involved, however, may offset the consistency gained by using identical browsers.

Any browser, on a different computer.

This is the most inaccurate testing procedure, of the choices listed. Any difference between the browsers, or computers, can lead to inaccuracy.

The differences, in testing, involve multiple details.

• Login identity in use.
• Cookie filters, that block identity.
• Script filters, that block identity access.
• Browser add-ons, that may or may not be present.
• Browser brand and design differences.

Login identity in use.

This is the one difference that you intentionally need, to test the reader experience. In the primary session, you are logged in as the owner. You require at least one secondary session - where you are not logged in as the owner, to test your blog as a reader.

The secondary session is where the need for sequential session reuse - or use of a different browser and / or computer - becomes necessary.

Cookie filters, that block identity.

Many Blogger features - involving both the dashboard, and access to the blog - use cookies to determine identity and permissions. Cookie filters, inappropriately managed, can cause havoc with Blogger. As an example, consider commenting ability, and third party cookies.

Different browsers may have different cookie filter settings. In some cases, identity is not relevant, for testing as a reader.

If you are testing access to a private blog, though, reader identity - which is cookie based - will be essential. A cookie filter involved, with a private blog being tested, will cause problems.

Similarly, testing Google+ comments requires known identity - for both the blog owner and readers. With Google+, identity is essential, to guarantee consistent display of comments.

Script filters, that block identity access.

Many Blogger features - involving both the dashboard, and content in the blog - are JavaScript based. Script filters can cause havoc with Blogger.

Different browsers may have different script filter settings - and different browser brands may have completely different script filters.

Browser add-ons, that may or may not be present.

The Firefox browser does not have native script filters, so many computer owners who use Firefox will add NoScript.

NoScript is a very intense add-on, with a lot of options, and opportunities for confusion. If you were to use Firefox on two different computers, you would need to carefully synchronise NoScript settings on both computers, for reliable testing.

Firefox with NoScript is the best known example - but it's not the only possibility for confusion. Every browser can have script filters, which will make browser to browser testing comparison a challenge.

With Chrome, one can select each individual add-on to be present in the secondary session ("Allow in incognito") - and this will create uncertainty. Some advice to "try using a Chrome incognito window" will be successful, with other advice being useless - and the absence or presence of the necessary add-on will be one of the issues.

AdBlock, optionally included in incognito mode, will produce uncertainty in testing - and is a well known script block.



Browser brand and design differences.

Every different browser produces differences in displayed content. Even a formatting discrepancy can lead to difference in test results.

The end results.

Interpreting test results, based on comparison of different browser displays, will be a challenge for anybody trying to produce reliable conclusions. The most reliable results will come from testing using the same browser session, sequentially. This will start with instructions to "clear cache, cookies, and sessions" - a painful but necessary process.

---

Many #Blogger problems need to be diagnosed using repetitive testing, and affinity / differential analysis. People who don't understand organised testing will sometimes recommend testing procedures, such as use of different browser sessions - which will produce inconclusive results.

Blogger Magic - Enabling Exceptions, In Chrome

Some blog owners and readers prefer to ignore recommendations in Chrome - and block cookies and / or scripts.

Blocking cookies can cause problems with many Blogger features - and blocking scripts will cause problems with both Blogger and with Google, and with various other websites.

If you want to use Blogger and Google effectively, you need to allow cookies to be installed, and to allow scripts to be run, on your computer.

If you cannot allow cookies and scripts for all websites, you can allow cookies and / or scripts on specific websites.

With Chrome, if you are willing to selectively allow specific websites to install cookies / run scripts, you should enable exceptions for those websites.

Start with the "Content settings" wizard.

Select "Block third-party cookies and site data", and / or "Do not allow any site to run JavaScript".



Add cookie exceptions, for specific websites.

Click on "Manage exceptions" under Cookies, to get the "Cookie and site data exceptions" wizard.

To add "google.com" as a cookie exception, paste / type "[*.]google.com", and select "Allow".

Click anywhere in the wizard window, to see the addition - then click "Done".



Add JavaScript exceptions, for specific websites.

Click on "Manage exceptions" under JavaScript, to get the "JavaScript exceptions" wizard.

To add "google.com" as a JavaScript exception, paste / type "[*.]google.com", and select "Allow".

Click anywhere in the wizard window, to see the addition - then click "Done".



Remember that cookie and script filter settings, in Chrome, may not be the only settings which you need to consider - and that many filters are subject to change, without your knowledge or approval.

For more detail about cookie and JavaScript exceptions, see Chrome Help: Manage exceptions. These are settings that you must determine and install - neither Blogger nor Google can make these changes for you.

---

Security conscious #Blogger blog owners may wish to ignore #Chrome recommendations, and block general permission for websites to install cookies and / or run scripts on their computers.

Some websites will not run properly, without cookies and scripts. If one is to use websites like Blogger and Google successfully, they need to be trusted - and Chrome must allow those websites to install cookies / run scripts.

Now, You See It - Now, You Don't

Some blog owners create a post, with content that should be visible, only when required.

The post contains a question - accompanied by the answer to the question. The question should be viewed, without the answer being visible, to make the reader think about the answer. This is called, by many, a "spoiler".

Not everybody knows how to construct a spoiler. Some blogs use JavaScript - painful to construct, and maybe not effective for every reader. Security conscious blog readers may block scripts from Blogger blogs - and either your spoiler is visible, immediately - or never becomes visible.

Neither of the latter scenarios make the post a lot of fun to read.

You don't need JavaScript, to make a spoiler.

This is fortunate, because not every reader is going to allow scripts, from every blog. Personally, I block JavaScript, in general - and enable only for my own blogs - and for specific websites, like the Blogger dashboard and most Google pages.

If the blog posts have a solid white background, you make the post text white.

Examine a post, in my text blog.

Two spoilers - both blank.

Click and drag across the first spoiler - and see the first answer.

Click and drag across the second spoiler - and see the second answer.



The spoiler code is not complicated.

What would YOU do?

What Lancelot chose is hidden. But - make <span style="font-weight:bold;">your</span> choice before peeking. To see the answer, highlight the area indicated, by clicking the mouse and dragging the cursor between the arrows.

The answer is here ==><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Noble Lancelot said that he would allow <span style="font-weight:bold;">her</span> to make the choice herself. Upon hearing this, she announced that she would be beautiful all the time because he had respected her enough to let her be in charge of her own life.</span><==

Now - what is the moral to this story? To see the answer, highlight the area indicated.

The answer is here ==><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">If you don't let a woman have her own way, things are going to get <span style="font-weight:bold;">ugly</span>.</span>==

Hoping that your blog does not use a semi transparent floating background over a multi colour background, just make the text the same color as the background. Then, instruct the reader to click and drag the cursor, to highlight and make the spoiler visible.

---

A #Blogger blog post which contains a question and answer section is fun to read - but not every blog reader will benefit, with posts that use JavaScript, to hide text content.

An easy way to hide content is to make the text the color of the background. The reader can click and drag, to highlight the text, when then is visible.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2011/10/cookies-vs-scripts-two-types-of-server.html

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2009/04/many-faces-of-google.html

</span>

Blogger Magic - Enabling Scripts, In Your Browser

Similar to the need to properly filter cookies in the browser, we have the need to properly filter scripts.

Cookies and scripts are completely different elements - but proper filtering of each is essential, to making many Blogger features operate properly.

If you have a problem with Blogger - either accessing / using the dashboard, or using / viewing a blog - one of the simplest things to check, complementing cookie filter settings, is the browser script filter settings.

The browser is the most important component, when setting up security - and scripts, like cookies, are a common challenge.

Script filters are adjusted differently, for each browser. Consider the multiple domains used by Blogger / Google - and layered security, on any computer, used by the owner and readers of any blog.

• Chrome.
• Firefox.
• Edge / Internet Explorer.
• Opera.
• Safari.

Setting the script filters in Chrome.

With Chrome, you enable scripts, using Settings ("Customize and control Google Chrome") - aka the 3 bar toolbar icon.

In Settings, if necessary, click on "Show advanced settings" at the very bottom of the page.

Under Privacy, click on "Content settings", which gives you the "Content Settings" wizard. Here, you have selections for Cookies and Javascript - including "Manage exceptions" for each section. Select the recommendation.

• JavaScript: Allow all sites to run JavaScript

Hit "Done" - and close the Settings tab.

From "Privacy", hit "Content settings".

Under "JavaScript", select "Allow all sites to run JavaScript (recommended)".



Alternately, you may select "Do not allow any site to run JavaScript" - then use "Manage exceptions", and allow all blog(s) that you publish, and the many Blogger and Google domains, to run JavaScript. Make your exceptions complete, for best results.

Setting the script filters in Firefox.

Firefox does not contain any native script filters. The most popular add-on for Firefox is NoScript - and this is how most Firefox users filter scripts.

You'll need to designate "blogger.com", "google.com", and any Google domain excepting "blogspot.com", as trusted - when you load any display for the domain in question. An untrusted domain will show a "NoScript Untrusted" icon in the status area at the bottom of the window. To enable each domain, you position the cursor over the NoScript icon and select "Allow (domain URL)" in the popup menu.

Setting the script filters in Edge / Internet Explorer.

With Internet Explorer, you enable security settings - both cookies and scripts - from the browser menu, using Tools - Internet Options. Optionally, you may access the "Internet Options" applet directly from the Windows Control Panel.

• IE uses a zone defense setting, where you designate "blogger.com" and "google.com", in Security, as being in the Trusted zone. Please note that "blogspot.com", in general should not be in the Trusted zone - .
• You will want the published URL of your blog(s) - including any country local domain URLs, in the Trusted zone.
• Default settings for the Trusted zone will allow proper filtering of scripts.
• Verify proper settings, with "Trusted sites" selected, and the Security level slider control set to "Medium". Hit "Custom level", and examine the Settings list.
• Look for the "Scripting" section, 3/4 of the way to the bottom of the list.
• You will observe 6 options under "Scripting". Default settings will have all options Enabled, except "Allow Programmatic clipboard access"; you may wish to Enable this to allow easy use of Post Editor.
• Hit "OK", and "Yes" if necessary, then "OK" again.

Setting the script filters in Opera.

With Opera, you enable cookies and scripts from the Advanced tab, in the Preferences wizard. The Content menu contains selections for scripting.

Setting the script filters in Safari.

With Safari, you enable scripts, using the Preferences wizard. The Privacy wizard, in Preferences, contains selections for scripts ("Cookies and website data”).

Script filters cause problems with Stats "Don't track ..." and other Blogger features.

Many problems, reported in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue, with various Blogger features - and the Blogger dashboard - involve script filters.

Stats and the "Don't track ..." option used to involve third party cookies, for many years. In March 2016, the "Don't track" wizard was rewritten to run under the URL of the blog, when being set - and now requires enabling scripts from the blog URL.

Consider how your blog is published.

If your blog is published to "blogspot.com", consider the non "blogspot.com" alias that may be relevant to your country. If your blog is published to a custom domain, consider the custom domain URL.

Many computers have other relevant settings, which block scripts.

Many blog owners and readers will have computers, and networks, with additional protection. Scripts, in the browser, may not be the only filter that needs to be checked - but this is a start, to learning how to control the script filters.

Having checked and corrected your script filters, continue by checking browser cookie filters - then check cookie and script filters, outside the browser. Also check settings on any ad blocker add-on - which may be an app, or a browser extension.

Be aware that many settings may not be obvious - and that both obvious and obscure settings may be updated, without your intention or knowledge.

---

Many #Blogger problems are cause by overly restrictive script filters. If you, a blog owner or reader, are going to use Blogger successfully, you need to configure your browser properly - for both cookies and scripts.

Blogger Magic - Enabling Cookies, In Your Browser

The Blogger dashboard, and blog displays, is less of a pair of websites - and more of an application with code that runs on our computers.

The Blogger code on our computers requires cookies and scripts, which are installed as we use the various Blogger dashboard pages. The cookies and scripts are susceptible to interference, from overly restrictive layered security.

If you have a problem with Blogger - either accessing / using the dashboard, or using / viewing a blog - one of the simplest things to check, complementing script filter settings, is the browser cookie filter settings.

The browser is the most important component, when setting up security - and cookies are a common challenge.

Cookie filters are adjusted differently, for each browser. Consider the multiple domains used by Blogger / Google - and layered security, on any computer, used by the owner and readers of any blog.

• Chrome.
• Firefox.
• Edge / Internet Explorer.
• Opera.
• Safari.

Setting the cookie filters in Chrome.

With Chrome, you enable cookies, using Settings ("Customize and control Google Chrome") - aka the 3 bar toolbar icon.

In Settings, if necessary, click on "Show advanced settings" at the very bottom of the page. Under Privacy, click on "Content settings", which gives you the "Content Settings" wizard.

Here, you have selections for Cookies and Javascript - including "Manage exceptions" for each section. Select the recommendation.

• Cookies: Allow local data to be set

Hit "Done" - and close the Settings tab.

From "Privacy", hit "Content settings".

Under "Cookies", select "Allow local data to be set".



If you want to enable cookies selectively, select "Block third-party cookies and site data". Then use "Manage exceptions", and add "blogger.com", "google.com", and any addresses which apply to your blog.

Setting the cookie filters in Firefox.

With Firefox, you enable cookies, from the browser menu - aka the 3 bar toolbar icon, using Preferences - Privacy.

• Under History, select that "Firefox will:" is set to "Remember history" then "Use custom settings for history". That will give you an array of settings.
• Check "Accept cookies from sites".
• Close Preferences. Settings will be saved.
• Note that any Firefox add-ons which filter cookies, and offer more detailed options, will have to be dealt with, separately.

Select "Remember history", then "Use custom settings for history".

Check "Accept cookies from sites".



If you want to enable cookies selectively, change "Always" to "Never". Then use "Exceptions", and add "blogger.com", "google.com", and any addresses which apply to your blog.

Setting the cookie filters in Edge / Internet Explorer.

With Edge / Internet Explorer, you enable cookies, using the browser menu, selecting Tools - Internet Options. Optionally, you may access the "Internet Options" applet directly from the Windows Control Panel.

• Edge / IE uses a zone defense setting, where you designate "blogger.com" and "google.com", in Security, as being in the Trusted zone. Please note that "blogspot.com" should not be in the Trusted zone.
• Default settings for the Trusted zone will allow proper filtering of scripts.
• Verify proper settings, with "Trusted sites" selected, and the Security level slider control set to "Medium". Hit "Custom level", and examine the Settings list.
• You enable Cookies under the "Privacy" tab.
• Move the Privacy slider to the bottom, to allow all cookies.
• Click "OK".

Setting the cookie filters in Opera.

With Opera, you enable cookies, using the Advanced tab, in the Preferences wizard. Select "Accept", to accept cookies from all sites.

Setting the cookie filters in Safari.

With Safari, you enable cookies, using the Preferences wizard. The Privacy wizard, in Preferences, contains selections for cookies ("Cookies and website data”). Select "Always allow", to enable third party cookie access.

Cookie filters cause half of the problems reported, with many Blogger features.

Maybe 50% of the problems, reported in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue, with many Blogger features involve cookie filters.

• Comments.
• The Cookie Advice Banner.
• Post/Page/Template Preview.
• Reading List.
• Template Designer.

Stats and the "Don't track ..." option used to involve third party cookies, for many years. In March 2016, "Don't track" was rewritten to run under the URL of the blog, when being set - and now requires enabling scripts from the blog URL.

Consider how your blog is published.

If your blog is published to "blogspot.com", consider the non "blogspot.com" alias that may be relevant to your country. If your blog is published to a custom domain, consider the custom domain URL.

Many computers have other relevant settings, which block cookies.

Many blog owners and readers will have computers, and networks, with additional protection. Cookies, in the browser, may not be the only filter that needs to be checked - but this is a start, to learning how to control the cookie filters.

Having checked and corrected your cookie filters, continue by checking browser script filters - then check cookie and script filters, outside the browser. Be aware that many settings may not be obvious - and that both obvious and obscure settings may be updated, without your intention or knowledge.

Learn more.

• Google Accounts Help: Enable or disable cookies.

---

Many #Blogger problems are cause by overly restrictive cookie filters. If you, a blog owner or reader, are going to use Blogger successfully, you need to configure your browser properly.

Using A Killfile, To Filter Blogger Comments

We periodically see hopeful - yet naive - requests from blog owners, in Blogger Help Forum: Learn More About Blogger, asking about comment moderation improvement.

How do I add a disruptive commenter to a killfile list - and never see his/her nonsense ever again, without moderating every comment, being published?

This would be a popular feature - if it could be provided, in any way that would achieve results.

Using a killfile, to filter disruptive / malicios commenters, is not a likely possibility.

Anybody who does not want to be identified can comment as desired.

It is not possible to reliabily identify a comment publisher, who does not wish to be identified.

• Blogger / Google identity.
• IP address.

Disruptive individuals can't be identified, with any chance of success. Anybody who wants to publish comments can do so, using multiple accounts, and / or IP addresses.

Both Blogger / Google accounts and IP addresses can be easily cloaked.

Using either multiple Blogger / Google accounts - or IP addresses - is a trivial exercise for anybody who is determined enough to persistently publish unwanted comments.

Given the impossibility of identifying people who don't provide effective identification, Blogger is unlikely to provide a feature that would accomplish nothing - and possibly interfere with legitimate commenting.

The only solution for blocking unacceptable comments will always involve collaborative, fuzzy filters, trained by each blog owner.

---

Some #Blogger blog owners would like to use a killfile, to filter unacceptable comments. They don't understand that anybody who wants to persistently publish disruptive or malicious comments can easily mask their identity - and make killfile use an exercis in futility.

Commenting Requires Login, To Suppress Spam

Some blog owners don't understand the need to identify themselves, when commenting on our blogs.

We see an occasional question, in Blogger Help Forum: Get Help with an Issue, about comment authentication.

Why, if I've selected "Anyone - including Anonymous Users" under comment settings, for "Who can Comment?", do my visitors complain of having to login?

This blog owner, like many others, does not understand the Blogger spam mitigation policy, in Blogger Comments.

Blogger lets us select who we wish to allow to comment, on our blogs.

When we do not moderate, they require authentication, to cut down on the spam. Moderated comments, with CAPTCHA ("Show word verification") not required by the owner, appear to go straight to moderation.

Comment authentication makes genuine comments more normal.

By requiring authentication, Blogger makes it more likely that a comment, awaiting moderation, will be genuine - instead of more spam. This encourages us to moderate comments more frequently - and helps us publish moderated comments, more promptly.

And more frequent moderation discourages spam - and makes it more likely that we will see actual comments, later.

Blog owners choose how to allow comments.

As a blog owner, it's your choice how / whether to allow comments.

• Anyone - includes Anonymous Users.
• Everybody with a Google, or an OpenID, account.
• Everybody with a Google account.
• Blog members only.
• Comments disabled.

Blog readers choose how to publish comments.

Depending upon the choices that you provide, your readers choose how they may authenticate.

• "Anyone" allows a reader to comment anonymously - or identified.
• If they wish to comment anonymously, they login, using a CAPTCHA.
• If they wish to comment using a profile, they login, using an account.
• Login is generally only required, with the first comment.

"Anyone" allows a reader to comment anonymously - or identified.

"Anyone" allows anyone to comment anonymously (if they wish). To cut down on spam, anyone commenting has to login.

If they wish to comment anonymously, they login, using a CAPTCHA.

Solving a CAPTCHA lets them remain anonymous - but still identify themselves as a person, not a bot. Any comments, awaiting moderation, or published, are more likely to be genuine - not spam.

If they wish to comment using a profile, they login, using an account.

They can login, as permitted, using a Google or OpenID account. Anyone able to login with a Google or OpenID account can still publish a comment anonymously, if they wish.

Login is generally only required, with the first comment.

If someone has to login repeatedly, to comment, they have a problem with identification, and filters. With cookies and scripts properly permitted, login (with the first comment) will be remembered (with any later comments).

The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer - if they wish to comment, most easily.

---

Both a #Blogger blog owner - and blog readers - get choices how to authenticate when commenting. Depending upon the choices made by the owner, the readers get more, or less, choices.

Train Security Products, And Keep Your Blog Clean

Everybody who uses a computer - and expects to use their computer for any amount of time - has one or more protective products on their computer.

Anybody who publishes a blog, with an audience that has any need for security, is going to receive occasional reports from would be readers.

I can't read your blog! My computer displays an "Unsafe website!" warning!

All computer security products, unfortunately, will occasionally generate false positives. Analysing false positive malware reports is as much a part of every security product, as identifying the actual malware.

If you publish a blog, you need to know how to handle reader malware alert reports.

Know online tools, for researching reported problems.

Google provides 2 websites, for analysis of blog / website malware alerts. Both Google SafeBrowsing, and VirusTotal, are Google products that can help to identify actual problems with blogs and websites.

Besides the two Google products above, I use 3 security analysis websites, which can identify specific security problems in blog / website code. Quttera Online Website Malware Scanner, and Sucuri SiteCheck, and Trend Micro SIte Safety Center, have been useful at various times, when a security problem is reported.

You may, from time to time, use all of these - and possibly others - in identifying and verifying a security problem with your blog, or with blogs and websites that you link. For best results, always specify the canonical blog URL, when requesting security analysis - and when sharing the blog, or individual posts.

Specify the canonical URL.

Not a country local domain.



Know what you need to do, to keep your blog healthy.

As a blog publisher, you will occasionally have 2 jobs to do, when receiving a malware alert report which references your blog.

1. Verify / identify / remove any actual malicious content.
2. Report false positives, to the protective service displaying a false positive.

Everybody who publishes a blog, with any reader audience, has seen this advice, or something similar, when surfing their blog.



Know how to keep your blog clean - and your reputation clean.

You have to use online malware analysis services, to identify any problem which you may have created, by installing the latest "gotta have this!" accessory on your blog. And, you have to report any false positive alert, to the owners of any security product, that falsely identifies your blog as a problem.

You do both, to support your readers. You do not want your readers computers hacked, through your inappropriately accessorising your blog - but at the same time,you want your readers to be able to read your blog.

1. Keep your blog content clean.
2. Keep your blog reputation clean.

Do both - or you may not have readers, to read your blog.

---

Any #Blogger blog owner needs to support the blog readers, by publishing a blog clean of any malware, and with a good reputation with the various security products that prevent malicious action by dangerous blogs and websites. Your readers need the ability to use their computers to read your blog - and they need their security to not falsely identify your blog as a problem.

Stats "Don't Track" - You Cannot Satisfy Everybody

Blogger recently redesigned the Stats "Don't track ..." option - and removed third party cookies from the picture.

The "Don't track ..." wizard is now accessed from the blog URL. The wizard still produces cookies - but they are ordinary first party cookies, which are much less feared than third party cookies.

But, every silver lining has a cloud.

In making the "Don't track" wizard accessed under the blog URL, Blogger created a new requirement - which is no more understood, by some blog owners, than "third party" cookies.

"Don't track" now runs scripts from the blog URL, instead of the Blogger dashboard.

In order for a blog to observe - and preserve - the "Don't track" setting, any computer that the owner uses has to permit first party cookies - and all scripts - from the blog, instead of from the Blogger dashboard.

Since "Don't track" is designed to be used by the blog owner, this new requirement should not be a problem. Every blog owner should be able to trust herself / himself, to not add dodgy code to his / her own blog.

Owners of blogs published to custom domains will have to tweak the URL used by the "Don't track ..." Stats wizard, to set "Don't track" - since custom domains do not support HTTPS.

Many security products block scripts from personally owned blogs.

Unfortunately, general security practice is to block scripts from "blogspot.com", "blogspot.xx" (for every "xx" for every country local domain"), and preferably for blogs published to custom domains.

You can trust scripts from "blogger.com", and the Blogger dashboard. You cannot trust the individual blogs, since you cannot trust every blog owner. Even if you could trust some people not to intentionally try to hack your computer, you cannot trust everybody to not stupidly install malicious software from a very convincing hacker, providing one more "gotta have this" blog accessory.

And since you cannot trust the individual blogs, you will have filters. And those filters have to be adjusted, to trust your own blogs - if you want to ignore your own pageviews.

Some blog owners add security software, and don't know how to maintain the filters.

There are too many Blogger blog owners who have installed protective software on their personal computers - without knowing how to adjust the filters, in the protective software. And some of those owners think that it is a Blogger responsibility, to provide them instructions, how to adjust the protective software on their own computers - when only they are capable of knowing what they installed.

---

The new version of the Stats "Don't track" option is an improvement, because it no longer requires third party cookies - and involves the associated security risk. Unfortunately, it now requires blog owners to permit scripts, from the blogs themselves.

This is not a security risk, in that only personally owned blogs need to be trusted - but the blog owners do need to know how to adjust the filters involved. And not everybody with a computer knows how to configure their security accessories.

The New Stats "Don't track" Option, And Script Filters

The new Stats "Don't track" option is an improvement, to many blog owners.

"Manage tracking your own pageviews", as before, starts from the Stats dashboard page. The wizard now runs from a sub directory of the blog managed by the dashboard - and uses a normal (first party) cookie.

Now, blog owners no longer must enable third party cookies, to make Stats ignore their page views. This is an improvement - but it can still present a challenge, for some blog owners.

Besides filtering "third party" cookies, not all blog owners and readers will permit complete control by content under the individual blogs.

If you want "Don't track" to work reliably, enable scripts for the blog URL.

If you want the "Don't track" option to work reliably for your blog, you now must enable scripts to run under the published URL.

We have to trust scripts run from "blogger.com" - that is the Blogger dashboard. The Blogger dashboard is produced by Blogger Engineers - and if we trust Blogger to host our blogs, we have to trust their code.

Scripts which run under the individual blogs - "blogspot.com", local country domains, and custom domains - can be added by the owner of each individual blog. Not all blog owners should be trusted.

People who mistrust third party cookies may also mistrust scripts which run under "blogspot" etc. Unfortunately, to make "Manage tracking your own pageviews" work, you (the blog owner) now have to open up any script filters, which block content run as part of your blog.

Start from the Stats dashboard page.

Click on "Manage tracking your own pageviews".



"Manage tracking your own pageviews" now runs under the blog published URL. This removes "third party" cookies from the problem.

With a custom domain published blog, you must use the wizard in "HTTP:" mode.

By default, the new wizard runs in SSL mode. This will be a problem, with blogs published to custom domains.

If the blog is published to a custom domain, you will need to change "https" to "http".

Check "Don't track my views for this blog." - then close the tab / window.



The new wizard, "Would you like to have your pageviews counted when you visit this blog?", now runs as "blogging.nitecruzr.net", for this blog.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/b/statsCookieManage

If you publish to a custom domain, and you can correct the URL, you will see the same, for your blog. If you publish to "blogspot", you can see the same also. This is a script - and the script is subject to security filters.

And yes, there is no "Save" button, or link. Just the box.

Don't track my views for this blog.

Click the box or don't. As soon as you click, it's set. If you change your mind - now or later - click the box, again, and clear the option.

You should trust your blog - even though you do not trust other blogs, in general.

Generally, as the blog owner, you can safely trust content run under your blog. You probably should not trust "blogspot.com", and all blog publishers, however. This means that you will require multiple filter rules - for every browser and security add-on, that contains a script filter.

• Block all "blogspot.*". (Please!).
• Permit "yourblog.blogspot.com".

If you publish to "blogspot.com", and live in a country which has a local domain, such as the UK, you need a rule to permit the local domain alias.

• Permit "yourblog.blogspot.co.uk".

If you have multiple blogs - and want to block pageviews from being counted, for each blog, you need permissive filter rules for each blog.

• Permit "yourblog1.blogspot.*".
• Permit "yourblog2.blogspot.*".
• etc.

If you publish your blog to a custom domain, you need a rule to permit the domain URL. For this blog, I need

• Permit "blogging.nitecruzr.net".

If you do not permit the proper URL(s) for your blog, you will find Stats counting your own pageviews. Possibly, this will happen even with "Don't track my views for this blog." checked. In some cases, the check mark will be cleared, when you close the window.

---

Owners of #Blogger blogs who don't want their activity tracked by Stats now see a new "Don't track" wizard. Using the "Don't track" option no longer requires enabling third party cookies - and worrying about the security issues.

Unfortunately, this now means that the "Don't track" wizard may now be vulnerable to filters which restrict scripts that run under blogspot, and any custom domains.